Working Draft — content version 1.4.0 · review package 1.2 · not approved content
SRCF
SRCF / challenge

Challenge the framework

You do not need to be appointed to challenge SRCF. If a unit is wrong, a boundary is drawn badly, or the register misses what your job actually demands — say so here, on the record. Challenges are triaged by the Secretariat alongside formal review comments.

Submit a challenge
LRA may edit, abridge, combine, publish, sublicense and transfer your input for any purpose, including free or commercial training, certification and licensing, without payment, approval or attribution. You still choose separately whether we publish your name.
What makes a strong challenge
One issue at a time. One substantive point per challenge, like formal review comments.
Name the object. Cite the stable ID if you can — A.1, A.1-K01, DEF-A01. Every page shows them.
Say why it matters. What breaks in practice if this stays as it is?
Bring evidence. Professional experience counts as evidence — say what you have seen.
What happens next
Challenges enter the same triage as review comments: logged and categorised. Valid, in-scope comments receive a documented decision on the record, with the rationale recorded whether the point is taken up or not. Material challenges are answered in the response-to-comments record. Your challenge informs the decision; the SRCF Technical Council decides — support is a signal, never a vote. For structured, appointed review see how the review works.